What the new federal admissions data rules mean for US college applicants
A new federal survey asks US colleges to report admissions data by race and sex, including test scores and GPAs. What it changes, what it doesn't, and what it means for international applicants.
Admissions Insights
US colleges are being asked to show the federal government not just whom they admit, but the numbers behind those decisions. In August 2025, a memorandum from President Trump directed the Department of Education to require detailed admissions data from colleges, including applicants' race and sex alongside their grades and test scores, and gave the department until early December to start collecting it. The administration presents the memorandum as a matter of fairness and transparency: a way to confirm that colleges are following the Supreme Court's 2023 ban on race-conscious admissions.
Although the reporting requirement has since been challenged in court and partly blocked, it signals where admissions is heading after affirmative action. For families, the real question is whether it changes what colleges look for in a student.
What colleges are being asked to report
The memorandum calls for colleges to send the federal government detailed admissions data, including:
applicants' race and sex
standardized test scores (SAT, ACT) and high school GPAs
admission rates and financial aid, including scholarships
The data is collected through the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), the national college database run by the department's National Center for Education Statistics. Its stated purpose is to reveal whether colleges are still giving weight to race anywhere in their selection process.
That makes it more than another statistical report. Since the Supreme Court's 2023 decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, colleges have had to strike a new balance between diverse classes and race-neutral selection, and the federal government now intends to track that balance directly. Many observers read the reporting requirement as a message to colleges: be ready to justify your choices. Publishing outcomes is no longer enough; a college may need to show the criteria and data behind them.
Selective colleges feel it most
The reporting requirement does not land equally. As Oregon Public Broadcasting (OPB) reported, most US colleges admit the majority of their applicants and already decide largely on high school grades, so having to report those numbers is unlikely to change how they admit students.
Have a question you want to investigate?
Explore our faculty-guided programs, or tell admissions what you are curious about.
It is more complicated at colleges with extremely low admission rates, such as Harvard, Princeton and Stanford. These schools once weighed racial background carefully to build diverse classes, and since the 2023 ruling some elite colleges have seen the share of Black and Hispanic students fall. In response, selective colleges increasingly read an applicant's background through essays, recommendations and activities, not as race but as context.
Background in itself is no longer what gets evaluated. What still counts is how it shaped a student's academic work, leadership and motivation. The standards have changed less than the way files are read. As experts put it, colleges now look at the context of a student's effort instead of race, trying to understand the circumstances that made an achievement possible, not just the score.
Academic achievement stays at the center
Through all of this, colleges still treat academic achievement as the core measure. Nate Mannetter, who leads enrollment at Gonzaga University, told OPB that it is the most heavily weighted criterion. In practice, that means the high school transcript: grades and the rigor of the courses behind them.
That is not simply a matter of high or low marks. Colleges look at how far students challenged themselves within the options their school offered, and whether they built a steady record over time. An A in an AP, IB or honors course means something different from an A in a standard class.
Test-optional policies had shrunk the role of the SAT and ACT at many colleges, but some analysts expect the reporting requirement to bring scores back into focus as part of each college's admissions data. If the balance tips partly back toward numbers a college can show, a consistent, credible academic record matters even more.
The competition has grown more complicated. What colleges are ultimately assessing has not: intellectual curiosity, deep engagement with a subject, and steady growth.
Activities and recommendations still show context
Colleges still want the story behind the numbers. Without weighing race or background directly, admissions readers use essays, recommendations and activity records to see which experiences shaped a student and how those experiences connect to academic interests. Two things are likely to count for more:
Depth over breadth: sustained commitment to one field rather than a long list of unrelated activities
Process over titles: how a student solved problems and what they learned, rather than awards or positions alone
Recommendations work the same way. A letter carries weight when it goes beyond praise and describes, concretely, how the student developed. With race out of the evaluation, these documents are one more way for colleges to understand who a student is and what they have achieved.
What it means for international applicants
The reporting requirement focuses on data about domestic applicants, but it has indirect implications for international students.
Comparable academic data may carry more weight. As colleges analyze their whole applicant pool in finer detail, international students gain from presenting objective measures clearly: GPA, test scores and English proficiency.
Context still sets applicants apart. With race no longer a factor, essays and activity records that show what a student took on and achieved inside a different education system remain a genuine point of distinction.
The change is less a new opening than a signal to make every part of the application clearer and more coherent.
What has happened since
The memorandum moved quickly from policy to a reporting requirement, and then into court. It took shape as a new IPEDS survey, the Admissions and Consumer Transparency Supplement (ACTS), which applies to four-year colleges that do not admit every applicant. ACTS asks for data on applicants, admitted students and enrolled students broken down by race and sex, including test scores, GPA and family income, for 2025–26 and the six years before it.
Presidential memorandum directs the Education Department to expand admissions reporting
December 2025
The ACTS survey is approved and opens to colleges
March 2026
First submission deadline; 17 states sue in federal court in Massachusetts
April 2026
The court blocks enforcement for public colleges in those states, then for about 178 more institutions
Judge F. Dennis Saylor found that the survey had likely been rolled out in an arbitrary and capricious way, while noting that the department does have general authority to collect admissions data. Most of the roughly 178 additional institutions belong to six higher education associations that joined the case, including the Association of American Universities. Other colleges still had to report, and hundreds had already submitted. The department has said it plans to make the data public, but with many of the most selective universities covered by the injunctions, the first national picture is likely to have gaps.
More transparent, same fundamentals
Whatever the courts decide about ACTS, the push behind it goes beyond its stated goal of fairer admissions: it aims to redefine how colleges use data to judge students. One thing has not moved. Admissions still comes down to the consistency of a student's achievement and growth. Even as policies and criteria shift, what colleges ultimately want to know is what problem a student noticed in their own surroundings and how persistently they worked to solve it.
So treat this moment as a chance to present your record more clearly, not as a reason for alarm. Grades, coursework, activities, recommendations and essays are separate pieces, but together they answer a single question: why do I learn, and what have I tried to change? Students who can answer it honestly still stand out, and greater transparency tends to make real ability and depth of thinking easier to see.
One way to build that kind of record is a sustained research project in a field you care about, where the question, the method and the revisions are your own. In CRI's Winter Online Research Program, university faculty guide students over the winter break through a research project and a paper written in English.
